Donovan’s
Version: (New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1955. 127 pp)
Andrew’s Version:
(New York: Scribner, 1980. 93 pp)
Since both of the
contributors are actively involved in a book group, we thought it might be
interesting to review the books we read for this group in a “book discussion”
style. What follows is less a critical reflection on the literary themes in a
particular work and more a discussion about the novel. What we liked; what we
didn’t like; what we thought the author intended to say; whether or not we
thought the author succeeded in communicating those thoughts. Who knows how it
will end up but here we go!
Donovan: We
just finished Ernest Hemingway’s The Old
Man and the Sea, Andrew, and before we analyze the book, we should probably
give a brief plot summary. A short novella, The
Old Man and the Sea is Ernest Hemingay’s Pulitzer Prize-winning and final
work. Set in Cuba during the Joe DiMaggio-era (sometime in the 1940s), the tome
follows Santiago, an old fisherman riding the longest fishing drought (84 days)
of his life. Although a typical day of fishing involves the help of a young boy
and apprentice, Manolin, Santiago’s recent string of bad luck results in the
boy moving to another fisherman.
Faced with
another day at sea with no help, Santiago rows out into the gulf on his small
skiff. Unlike previous days, a giant fish takes the bait early on during the
day. After an early and intense
struggle, Santiago realizes that he has hooked no ordinary fish. With the
creature swallowing an enormous length of line and Santiago’s calloused hands
struggling to fight back, the fisherman knows he has a hefty marlin on the
line. What follows is a story of humanity’s fight with nature and the will of
an old man to reel in one final catch.
Q: So Andrew, what did you make of The Old Man and the Sea? Did you enjoy
it? Was it a simple man-in-nature story or did Hemingway intend to write
something with more depth?
Photo by Fadzly Mubin |
"His hands had the deep-creased scars from handling heavy fish on the cords...” (1).
Later on while
out at sea,
“He had pushed his straw hat hard down on his head before he hooked the fish and it was kitting his forehead. He was thirsty too...” (40).
And, finally,
toward the end of the work, Santiago mimics Christ by showing Santiago climbing
the road home,
“He started to climb again and at the top he fell and lay for some time with the mast across his shoulder. He tried to get up. But it was too difficult and he sat there with the mast on his shoulder and looked toward the road” (89).
And those were
the more obvious ones: Christ’s scars on his hands from the nails, on his head
from the crown of thorns, and falling from the weight of the cross. Imagery
like this is somewhat rare to find, and I think it enhanced the depth of the
novel.
Q: What about you, Donovan? Did you see any depth in the novella?
Donovan: I did, Andrew. To be honest, I did
not readily see the Christ imagery you so eloquently stated. While I read The Old Man and the Sea, I continued to
link the story back to Hemingway. With this book acting as the final work
before Hemingway’s death, there is certainly a link between Santiago as the
over-the-hill fisherman and Hemingway, an author whose best work many
considered behind him.
Photo by Kivanc Nis |
Moreover, I found
Santiago’s continual yearning for the young boy’s assistance during his bout
with the marlin to link to the vigor of youth. Hemingway writes,
“If the boy were here he would wet the coils of line, he thought. Yes. If the boy were here. If the boy were here” (83).
As a fisherman
struggling not only with the strength of the fish but also with the limits of
his frail body, Santiago longs for the boy’s help not just to catch the marlin
faster but also as a sort of eulogy to the vigor of youth long lost.
They say the
moment you turn 40 your body exponentially declines. I can’t help but link
Hemingway’s advancing age, his length between novels, and the old man looking
at youth with fondness.
Q: So Andrew, you have clearly found a
depth in Hemingway’s imagery. But let me bring you back to the surface level.
Did you enjoy reading The Old Man and the
Sea? Did the novella’s length enhance or inhibit the work? Would you
recommend that those who have yet to read this book do so?
Andrew: For me, good short reads are hard to
find. While I enjoy longer novels, because there is a depth of character and
plot development, I found that Hemingway achieved the same level of character
depth in this novel. I think the length enhanced the work, as it was as though
Hemingway was telling the story orally to friends that he knew. It was very
refreshing, and a good read overall. I would give it 4 out of 5 stars.
Q. What about yourself? Would you
recommend this novella to others?
Donovan: I would. This book reminded me of the
reality television show, River Monsters.
Previously, I believed fishing to be a pacific exercise. I thought the act of
catching a fish carried less significance than the serenity around waiting for
a fish. River Monsters and The Old Man and the Sea depict the
torturous action of catching a fish. Simply put, fishing is brutal through the
time and strength it takes to put a fish in a boat. Hemingway’s novella
expresses bravado, brokenness, and the basic fight with nature. The Old Man and the Sea is a classic
well worth reading. I give it a 4.5 out
of 5 stars.
Born in Oak Park, Illinois, in 1899,
Ernest Hemingway began writing in 1917 for The Kansas City Star. He served as an ambulance driver during World War I and moved to
Paris in 1921. While in Europe, Hemingway associated with a group of notable
expatriates such as Gertrude
Stein, F.
Scott Fitzgerald, Ezra
Pound, and Ford
Madox Ford. Noted for his terse prose, Hemingway’s fiction won him
the Nobel
Prize for Literature in
1954 and his work, The Old Man and the Sea, won the Pulitzer Prize in
1953. He died in Ketchum, Idaho on July 2, 1961.
---
Posted by: Donovan Richards and Andrew Jacobson
Affiliate Links:
No comments:
Post a Comment